INVESTOR'S DAILY EDGE UNPLUGGED
ABOUT IDE FAQS ARCHIVES PRODUCTS CONTACT US WHITELIST US  
IN THIS ISSUE  
Working the Plan - What to Do with a Losing Stock
It’s Florida Time!
MEET THE TEAM
  MaryEllen Tribby
Publisher
  Jedd Canty
Business Director
  Jon Lewis
Managing Editor
  Nicole Reynolds
Marketing
  Jon Herring
Editor
ANALIST/EDITORIAL CONTRIBUTORS
  Charles Delvalle
  Andrew M. Gordon
  Dr. Russell McDougal
D.D.S.
  Rick Pendergraft
  Chris Johnson
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
  Working the Plan - What to Do with a Losing Stock  
 

 

Lynn Carpenter

Maybe we could start a club, but it wouldn’t be very exclusive.  It seems everybody belongs to the cadre of people who made dumb stock decisions at least once. After writing about my reactions to my bothersome loser stock that I bought on a tip without investigating for myself, lots of readers sent comments.  Let’s just say I have company.  The interesting thing was that most of them ran on the same theme - remember your discipline.

Here’s what Linda M. had to say on the subject:

You've just saved me from doing the same things you did!  Thanks for reminding me of all the reasons why I bought into my funds in the first place.  I will hang on to them and not panic.  They all have great holdings and are rated 4 and 5 star by Morningstar, even though I've lost over 10% now.  It's not the funds, it's the economy and emotional selling and panic that's affecting them.

I don't own individual stocks because I don't know how to purchase them.  I also feel safer owning funds.  I'm applying what you wrote about to funds, because I believe your words apply to funds as well as stocks.

Yes, you’re right, Linda, provided you do have excellent funds.

Unlike Linda, I don’t feel safe at all in mutual funds.  I hate that they reveal positions only once a quarter and those may be stocks they added the day before preparing their reports, not the losers they held the previous 12 weeks.  I hate the excessive trading in most of them, the selection by committee, and me-too backwardness of most funds.  And who knows what the going growth rate, return on equity, price to sales, etc. is for the basket of stocks in a fund.  It’s too much of a dark hole for my comfort.

But if you do not know how to pick stocks yourself and aren’t confident that you are on an upward learning curve and getting better at it, then top-quality funds are your answer.  The point here is that Linda knows what she knows.  More importantly, she knows what she doesn’t know.

Her second point is well taken, too.  When the economy is down and so is the stock market, it shouldn’t unnerve you too much to see your stocks dropping. A falling price doesn’t necessarily mean anybody is being smart.

As long as you can follow the underlying fundamentals of the business, you can judge a company’s capacity to rebound and carry on when the economy improves.  That’s another reason I prefer individual stocks instead of funds myself.  With a fund, you have to trust the managers.  

At the extreme other end of the investment world, Curtis H. buys individual stocks and works his plan diligently.  He has no mercy for losers:

I take out the emotional aspect of trading.  This has been a very difficult process.  I do the research i.e. P/E , profits, momentum, and the yearly moving average of the stock.  If the price of the stock is within 5% of its yearly average, more than likely it will hit up against the high and sell off. The key is to be the first in (buy low) and the first out (sell high) of a position. Trading is a very predatory environment … I set stop losses but I never set a price to get out when the stock is rising.

Curtis has a plan.  He sticks to it.  But there’s one little bit of confusion here. Curtis is not an investor.  Trading and investing are fraternal twins.  They look a lot alike, but they have genetic differences.  

Curtis is a trader.  He’s clear on that point.  Trading is a good thing for those who do it successfully.  It’s a lot of work and takes constant attention and good knowledge of technical signals.  But trading is quite different from long-term value investing or even long-term growth investing.

The timeline matters.  An investor might do exactly the opposite of Curtis, as befits his style.  When Curtis is rightly selling out as a trader with short-term criteria, an investor might even buy more of stocks that are down on their luck if their research shows them a good prospect for long-term performance.

Everybody knows Warren Buffett, so I will use him as an example.  You don’t see him drop core positions because the stock dropped, yet his long-term record is incredible.  His short-term record, however, often reeks.  Even on his shorter-term positions (which last two or three years), he exhibits the “strong-hands” style of the investor.  He will hang on through a drop that would upset most people.

The length of your outlook makes a big difference, as I can show you with a real example.  I remember several years ago, I recommended Office Depot in Fleet Street Letter.  It promptly fell about 47 percent, right out of the gate. How embarrassing.  But all the reasons for buying were still active, so I stuck with it, nervous, but determined to stay on system.

A few months later, news broke that Warren Buffett had secretly bought the stock at about the same time.  Office Depot bounced up on the news of Buffett’s stake, and the company also did what it should.  The stock recovered all its loss and added 100 percent in the next year.  In six years, it was up 500 percent.  This only worked out because of the long-term horizon for investors.

For a trader, sticking around to take a full 47-percent loss would have been suicide.  The trader would have been out quickly with a much smaller loss on such an adverse move and gone on to better trades.

So, discipline involves not just using your system, but having one that is correct for your goals.  Curtis is a trader.  Momentum and average price fit what he’s doing.  They are not great fits for the investor who should be following the underlying fundamentals of the business.

A third variation from Rob R. bridges the investor-trader divide.  Rob acts like an investor and hangs in there for the long run … to a point. But he uses a trader-style tool to make it easier:

I think we all know that empty feeling watching our stocks slide into losing positions.  Having been down there one to many times and needing to preserve capital I almost always buy puts to cover my positions.  The hard part is making the decision and waiting can be costly.  I don't believe it’s too late to start hedging.

There’s a nice compromise in this approach.  You can watch the market do its thing knowing you have puts in place to protect you.  The put option will give you the right to sell the stock at whatever price you chose when you selected which put to buy.  If the stock falls and rebounds, fine.  The stock’s a winner.  If it falls too much, that’s also fine, because you can exercise the option to sell your shares at the chosen strike price.

Using puts like this makes sense for investors with large positions or, as Rob notes, to preserve capital.  A good case for that would be a block of stocks that you plan to cash out in a year or two but want to keep following as close to the planned selling time as possible.  Because the market can always act like it is now, it would be too risky to stay in stocks if you are going to need all the money.  Normally, you would switch money you’d need to tap soon into something less volatile than stocks to be sure it was there when you wanted it.  But with a protective put, you can ride the stock knowing you can get out at a good price no matter what the market does.

My system?  I’m long-term and value oriented.  I follow the business and ride through the bumps.  Three things make this possible.  One, you have to do your research before buying and keep up with it periodically to make sure the business is on track.  Two, you must have a truly long investment horizon, five years or more.  You don’t need to stay in any stock that long if it turns out to be a bad idea, but you should choose stocks that you expect to go the distance.  And three, you need a nice-sized portfolio so that one bummer doesn’t kill you.

By the way, Andy is helping me set up a blog page for more frequent observations, and I hope I can do mine as nicely as he’s doing his.  I’ll give you a heads up when it’s ready next week or the week after.

In the meantime, check out Andy’s blog at vergeasia.blogspot.com.  It’s free and unencumbered.  You won’t have to take any surveys, give your mother’s maiden name, or any other bothersome things.  Just read and enjoy.  Most of it is centered on Asia investing, and you’ll find some good tidbits there along with insights that aren’t going to show up in the mainstream.

Respectfully,

Lynn Carpenter

P.S.  To let me know what you thought of today's article, send an e-mail to: feedback@investorsdailyedge.com.

INTERNAL ENDORSEMENT

Winners Cherry Pick!
Losers Bottom Feed

Thousands of stocks have just fallen 40% or more... most will continue to tumble… but you should still overpower the markets.

Because a select few stocks are now set to roar back for outstanding near-term gains.

It’s time to party like it’s 2002
You don’t want to miss out… because, today, you can jump into any one of seven companies at what should be their once-in-a-lifetime lows… each is poised to take you to new highs.

Grab this low-hanging fruit here.

 

 

  It’s Florida Time!  
 

Charles Delvalle

 

Dear Reader,

I’ve lived in Florida practically my whole life.  I’ve lived here for so long that I don’t even remember playing in the snow as a child in New York.

Needless to say, I know Florida like the back of my hand … Broward County to be exact.

I can remember back in 1999-2000, I had just gotten out of high school (class of 2000, baby!) and my best friend was getting his money together so he could buy a new home.

At the time, I was attempting to be a stock broker, so I was getting God-awful pay (and not learning a thing about the markets).

So I wasn’t able to save up money and buy a place.  I wish I could have, because not long after that the great Florida housing boom started.

My friend saw the value of his home – which had no central air conditioning, needed tons of visual upgrades, and was in the middle of a ghetto – triple from $65k to more than $200k.

Why would a fixer-upper in the middle of a ghetto go for over 200k?  It’s beyond logic.

So you can understand why I chuckled when I saw Lee C. write in with this comment:

If you want to hear some easy to understand and up to date info on tax cuts, just take a look at the State of Fl.

From 2001 to 2006 home prices went waaaay up and taxes went way up too.  In fact the income to the State and Counties has more than doubled in that time, but the population didn't!
 
At the same time, the state and counties started spending all that new found money and now prices are coming down very fast, but the promised tax relief isn't coming.  So guess what? People are bailing out of FL by the thousands, going a bit further north to SC, Alabama, MS. etc. where taxes and prices are way lower.

In short, the politicians are used to the big bucks rolling in and don't want to give it up.  On Clearwater Beach alone, there are approx. 1,000 homes / Condos for sale and last month’s sales were 33 units!! To top it off, about 20 percent are in foreclosure!

That's what a LACK of tax cuts will get you - vacant properties, and less income. People are simply walking away from those overpriced condos!  Now the banks want a bail out and the state and county's have to deal with less income anyway! 

Lee, thanks for writing in.  But let me point out that the reason why people are leaving Florida actually has very little to do with taxes.

In fact, if you think about it, Florida is one of the cheaper states to live in.  There’s no income tax and sales tax is only six percent (eat your heart out, New York).

So why are people leaving Florida?  It comes down to home prices.  Did you know that 17.7 percent of Ft. Lauderdale residents are under the poverty line?  And Miami is even worse.

Yet even with this small fact, condos that were $500,000 and more were popping up everywhere.  How in the world could anyone afford a condo at those prices?  They couldn’t.  And the condo they could afford was crap.

In the past few years, housing in Florida has gotten out of control.  Prices went far too high for anyone to afford.  Sure, taxes didn’t help, but taxes weren’t what pushed prices higher.  Higher prices priced most people out of the market.

So what are these people to do – live in Florida and not buy a home, or leave Florida to Georgia where they can find a nice home for much less?  The answer seems obvious.

Another big cost for most homeowners – and one of the main reasons why they’re leaving – is home insurance.  Thanks to the hurricanes we’ve had over the years, property insurance in Florida has doubled and even tripled.

My parents are leaving Florida because they simply can’t afford the insurance and home they live in.  Puerto Rico is a lot cheaper for the same type of house (plus they don’t pay property taxes and insurance is very low).

And let’s not forget the number of subprime mortgages in Florida.  As foreclosures pop higher, people end up leaving the state.  The foreclosed homes start dragging down the value of other homes, and then you have more people who are looking to leave.

To add to Florida’s problems, you have schools that aren’t that great, horrible traffic (in the south), and hurricanes that come almost every year.

As you can see, there are plenty reasons to leave Florida.  While higher taxes might be a contributing factor, there are still many others that are causing people to leave.

With that said…

Last week I wrote an article on LEDs.  In the article I mentioned a few different companies to invest in.  But a few readers politely pointed out that one of the companies - Color Kinetics - was taken over last year by PHG.

My bad.  I was looking at a sheet of LED companies that I researched during the middle of last year, and didn’t stop to make sure that the list was still valid.

To everyone who let me know about the error, thanks so much.  And you can be sure that I’ll look to make sure errors like these don’t happen again.

To your success,

Charles

P.S.  To let me know what you thought of today's article, send an e-mail to: feedback@investorsdailyedge.com.

 

INTERNAL ENDORSEMENT

Recession in 2008?

Here’s how to Make a Fortune!

It is often said that stocks take the stairs on the way up... and the elevator on the way down. It’s true. When investors hit the panic button, look out below. And there are a lot of signs to suggest more downside is on the way in early 2008.

Are you prepared to profit if this happens? Is your portfolio protected? Either way, you’ll want to learn about a trading service that can provide protection – an advisory that has already produced gains of 203%... 129%... and 101% in just the last few months.

To learn more, please continue reading...

 

Attention Editors, Publishers, Marketers, and Webmasters!
Investor’s Daily Edge articles can be republished without charge. Leverage our powerful content on your website or blog!
Click here to get the no-hassle details.

Copyright © 2007 by Fourth Avenue Financial. All rights reserved. The Fourth Avenue Financial unites the stock-picking talents of several analysts and editors. Each of the services is based on individual trading/investment philosophies or vehicles and specific investment approaches.

Fourth Avenue Financials' Investor’s Daily Edge is intended specifically for mature investors with a strong sense of individual responsibility who want to arbitrage different viewpoints to optimize their personal investment strategy. We reserve the right to remove readers we believe do not meet these criteria from our distribution list without prior notice.

You are welcome to distribute this message, at your discretion, to others who you believe share the values of the Fourth Avenue Financial.

NOTE TO OUR READERS: Fourth Avenue Financial or Early To Rise does not act as an investment advisor or advocate the purchase or sale of any security or investment. Investments recommended in this publication should be made only after consulting with your investment advisor and only after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company in question.

Fourth Avenue Financial expressly forbids its writers from having a financial interest in any security that they recommend to their readers. Furthermore, all other employees and agents of Fourth Avenue Financial and its affiliate companies must wait 24 hours before following an initial recommendation published on the Internet, or 72 hours after a printed publication is mailed.

To contact us via the web, Click Here | phone 800-681-4759

 

We respect your privacy. You can view our privacy policy here.
© Copyright Early to Rise, LLC., 2008